“You know that invigorating almost galvanizing rush through your body you get when you stare vehemently into a blazing, pulchritudinous fire, that moment of intoxicated excitement that feels almost mesmerizing. Or, the feeling when you strike a match and it makes an expeditious roaring noise before it gradually quiets down to a small, but steady flame with much menacing potential? That’s how I describe love. It starts as a minuscule, innocent cinder that has the abeyance to turn into a breath taking, overpowering wildfire. We all know it’s perilous, but it’s all worth the risk to be a part of such a prepossessing few moments. Love has risks, it could start out as the inconsequential ember of a carefully lit match, but burned out from lack of care. It is painful, especially if it seemed once as perfect, but it’s part of life and learning to love. But occasionally there’s that one perfect strike of a match, that miraculous, exceptional flame that gives that perfect balance of warmth and light to guide your once dark paths, but still makes you take risks to stare deeper in the flame. When you find the person who makes the ember in your soul turn into a wild fire and never lets it burn out, hold on to them, you know it’s love.” —ZahideGashi, “Beauty Awakens the Soul to Act,” Tumblr, 2016 (retrieved March 28, 2024)
“Judgement” card for The Literary Tarot
“Faylita Hicks chose to pair the card Judgement with Dante Alighieri’s Divine Comedy, not just for the shared themes of self-reflection, awakening, and (obviously) judgement, but to bring to mind the question: who is doing the judging? Who is absolved, who is deemed guilty, who is held above those scales entirely? Dante reaches out in very human sympathy to those eternally damned for very human flaws, while the shade of Virgil, unmoved, places a restraining hand upon his shoulder.” —charminglyantiquated
This submission comes from a project called The Literary Tarot: see the Kickstarter page for the project here.
Contributed by Kendra Gardner, University of Kansas ’22
“Dante’s Inferno has always been so funny to me…”
“Dante’s Inferno has always been so funny to me because its this really important classic that is constantly referenced, but at the same time it’s really just a burn book. Dante Alighieri is Regina George and he wrote an entire book about a bunch of people he hates and why he hates them. Dante took out his pink gel pen and wrote out in big cursive letters: Achilles is a slut.” —aphrodarling on tumblr (April 24, 2019)
Regina George is the antagonist of the 2004 film Mean Girls.
Contributed by Kate McKee (Bowdoin College ’22)
The Seven Deadly Social Networks
“Lust, of course, is Tinder. That’s easy. In Dante’s Inferno, a source of much seven-deadly-sin apocrypha, lustful souls are blown around forever like they’re stuck in a hurricane. Today they would be condemned to a similar cyclone—to swipe right forever but never get a match.
“Gluttony is Instagram. We hear sometimes of Tantalus, stuck in a pool below branches laden with fruit. His punishment was that the fruit always pulled away from his grasp, and the water always receded when he tried to drink. So it is with Instagram: The most tantalizing morsels pass in front of our eyes, and we can eat none of them.
“On to Greed. According to Dante, the greedy and avaricious are condemned to joust with each other using enormous heavy boulders, forever. What’s more, they are rendered unrecognizable—each soul appears as the blandest, dullest version of itself. Does that sound like LinkedIn or what? Mandelbaum’s translation put it particularly well:
… I saw multitudes
to every side of me; their howls were loud
while, wheeling weights, they used their chests to push.
They struck against each other; at that point,
each turned around and, wheeling back those weights,
cried out: “Hi, I’d like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.”
“Sloth was Zynga once, per Hoffman, but Zynga is no more. Now sloth is Netflix. I know that’s not a social network, but, eh.
“Wrath, according to Dante, was a twin sin to sullenness. He wrote that they both came from the same essential error: Wrath is rage expressed, sullenness is rage unexpressed. And he condemned both the sullen and the wrathful to the Fifth Circle—where, in a foul marsh, the wrathful attacked each other unendingly, without ever winning; while the sullen sat beneath the murk and stewed and scowled and acted aloof. Rarely has there been a better description of Twitter.
“Envy makes people so desirous of what they don’t have that they become blind to what they have. That’s Pinterest. I don’t have a joke about it.
“And what about pride, the weightiest sin? Hoffman said it was Facebook, but I’m not so sure. Pride is sometimes considered the sin from which all others flow: the belief that one is essentially better than all one’s neighbors. It is, I imagine, something like telling everyone else they’re bad at what they do and then saying “ping me.” Pride is Medium.
“If Facebook doesn’t represent pride, then, what is it? Some theologians recognized two other sins beyond the original seven. The first was Vanity or Vainglory—an unrestrained belief in one’s own attractiveness, and a love of boasting. That’s Facebook.
“But the second of the new sins was Acedia, a word we have now largely lost but whose meaning survives somewhat in melancholy. It is the failure to do one’s work and take interest in the world—a cousin to boredom, exhaustion, and listlessness. It is the Hamlet Feeling. It is the feeling of Tumblr, it is the feeling of Deep YouTube—it is the feeling of the afternoon Internet.” […] –Robinson Meyer, The Atlantic, May 9, 2016
“Nel Mezzo”
Nel Mezzo: A Little Trip through Dante’s Inferno
Contributed by Bryce Livingston